Immigrants from Uganda vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,633,985 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.994. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.333% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 332.9 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $39,163, a difference of 15.0%), median household income ($87,553 compared to $76,383, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $90,951, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $62,330, a difference of 0.57%), householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $51,713, a difference of 1.3%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 41.6%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.8%), and receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and female poverty (13.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 83.8%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 82.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 81.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.7%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.81%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.95%), and family households (62.7% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 56.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 36.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.9%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 43.8%), and bachelor's degree (40.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.40%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 85.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.9%).