Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Alaskan Athabascans

Excellent
Fair
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,737,606 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.731. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 72.1 Alaskan Athabascans.
Czech Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $39,163, a difference of 13.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $90,951, a difference of 13.8%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $49,748, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,713, a difference of 0.57%), householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $62,330, a difference of 1.8%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $37,905, a difference of 2.9%).
Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Income
Income MetricCzechAlaskan Athabascan
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Tragic
$39,163
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Tragic
$94,429
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Tragic
$76,383
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Tragic
$43,393
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Tragic
$49,748
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Tragic
$37,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Fair
$51,713
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Tragic
$88,446
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Tragic
$90,951
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Excellent
$62,330
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Average
25.8%

Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 59.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 50.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 4.7%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.1%).
Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechAlaskan Athabascan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
23.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.7%

Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 116.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 113.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 108.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.2%).
Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechAlaskan Athabascan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Fair
17.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
11.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%

Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechAlaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
45.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Exceptional
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
81.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
81.8%

Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 45.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), family households (64.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.27, a difference of 5.0%).
Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechAlaskan Athabascan
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
61.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
43.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
37.7%

Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 126.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.9%).
Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechAlaskan Athabascan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
86.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Average
55.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.1%

Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 31.8%), associate's degree (47.2% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 29.4%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechAlaskan Athabascan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Fair
85.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
61.0%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Tragic
36.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Poor
1.7%

Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.9%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.9%).
Czech vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
Disability MetricCzechAlaskan Athabascan
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.9%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
9.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
32.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
54.0%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Poor
2.5%