Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Alaskan Athabascans

Poor
Fair
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,964,955 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.134% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 2,133.9 Alaskan Athabascans.
Ecuadorian Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $62,330, a difference of 13.4%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $76,383, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($95,114 compared to $94,429, a difference of 0.73%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $90,951, a difference of 3.1%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $37,905, a difference of 3.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Income
Income MetricEcuadorianAlaskan Athabascan
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Tragic
$39,163
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Tragic
$94,429
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Tragic
$76,383
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Tragic
$43,393
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Tragic
$49,748
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Tragic
$37,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Fair
$51,713
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Tragic
$88,446
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Tragic
$90,951
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Excellent
$62,330
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Average
25.8%

Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 33.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 32.0%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.84%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianAlaskan Athabascan
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
23.6%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
14.7%

Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 60.1%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianAlaskan Athabascan
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Fair
17.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
11.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.3%

Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 44.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianAlaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
45.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
81.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
81.8%

Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.5%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianAlaskan Athabascan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
61.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Tragic
43.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
37.7%

Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 80.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 56.2%), and no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 31.5%), and no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 45.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianAlaskan Athabascan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
86.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Average
55.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
8.1%

Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 101.6%), bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 1.7%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianAlaskan Athabascan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Fair
85.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
61.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
36.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 112.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 62.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianAlaskan Athabascan
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
9.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
32.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
54.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.5%