Swiss vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,602,620 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.893% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 3,892.7 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 16.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $90,951, a difference of 13.3%), and per capita income ($44,076 compared to $39,163, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $37,905, a difference of 0.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $51,713, a difference of 0.43%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $62,330, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 51.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 42.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and single female poverty (21.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 108.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 108.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 98.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 47.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.42%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (65.2% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 98.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 29.1%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and associate's degree (46.0% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 50.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 45.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.5%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.4%).