Immigrants from Brazil vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,975,665 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.254% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 254.1 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $39,163, a difference of 23.0%), median household income ($90,907 compared to $76,383, a difference of 19.0%), and median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $49,748, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $62,330, a difference of 0.060%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $51,713, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 49.4%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 90.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 87.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 21.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 55.1%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 27.2%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.60%), family households (63.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 54.1%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 44.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 50.0%), bachelor's degree (42.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 46.5%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.79%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 85.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 54.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.7%).