Norwegian vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,454,182 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 57.4 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $90,951, a difference of 14.0%), per capita income ($44,480 compared to $39,163, a difference of 13.6%), and median household income ($86,084 compared to $76,383, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $62,330, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $37,905, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $51,713, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 63.9%), married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 63.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 121.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 119.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 116.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (14.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 40.3%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.74%), family households (63.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.27, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 142.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.99%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (47.6% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 30.6%), bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 30.0%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.040%), 2nd grade (98.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.6%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.5%).