Immigrants from Europe vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,589,552 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to an increase of 23.4 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,950 compared to $39,163, a difference of 30.1%), median male earnings ($62,057 compared to $49,748, a difference of 24.7%), and median household income ($95,032 compared to $76,383, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,828 compared to $62,330, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,022 compared to $51,713, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 57.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 44.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.63%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 88.5%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 88.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 67.0%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 32.6%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 41.1%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 57.7%), bachelor's degree (43.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 50.6%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (90.5% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 72.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 53.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.0%).