Ethiopian vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,322,664 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.441. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.066% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to a decrease of 66.0 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 28.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $113,701, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,736 compared to $121,444, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $54,800, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $44,911, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $71,139, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and married-couple households (43.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (61.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.95%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.5%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.9%).