Sudanese vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sudanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sudanese

Burmese

Average
Exceptional
4,867
SOCIAL INDEX
46.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
190th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Sudanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,794,817 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Sudanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sudanese corresponds to an increase of 39.9 Burmese.
Sudanese Integration in Burmese Communities

Sudanese vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,401 compared to $113,701, a difference of 34.7%), median household income ($78,529 compared to $103,145, a difference of 31.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,718 compared to $121,444, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,982 compared to $54,800, a difference of 16.6%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $44,911, a difference of 17.5%).
Sudanese vs Burmese Income
Income MetricSudaneseBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,695
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,783
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,529
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,419
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,216
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,215
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,982
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,401
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,718
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,281
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Tragic
28.0%

Sudanese vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 46.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 44.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.91%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.7%).
Sudanese vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricSudaneseBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.0%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.0%
Exceptional
8.6%

Sudanese vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Sudanese vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSudaneseBurmese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Sudanese vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.70%).
Sudanese vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSudaneseBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
68.0%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.8%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.9%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.4%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Sudanese vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.6%), births to unmarried women (32.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.49%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (60.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 9.6%).
Sudanese vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSudaneseBurmese
Family Households
Tragic
60.0%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.4%
Exceptional
26.4%

Sudanese vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.13%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 7.8%).
Sudanese vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSudaneseBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.6%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
6.8%

Sudanese vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.4%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
Sudanese vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricSudaneseBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.2%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.2%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.6%

Sudanese vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Sudanese vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricSudaneseBurmese
Disability
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.5%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%