Puerto Rican vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Puerto Rican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Puerto Ricans

Burmese

Tragic
Exceptional
244
SOCIAL INDEX
0.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
347th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Puerto Rican Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,396,889 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Puerto Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.560. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puerto Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puerto Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Burmese.
Puerto Rican Integration in Burmese Communities

Puerto Rican vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,234 compared to $121,444, a difference of 75.4%), median family income ($70,423 compared to $123,369, a difference of 75.2%), and median household income ($59,197 compared to $103,145, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($39,726 compared to $54,800, a difference of 37.9%), median female earnings ($31,560 compared to $44,911, a difference of 42.3%), and wage/income gap (18.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 49.7%).
Puerto Rican vs Burmese Income
Income MetricPuerto RicanBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$31,268
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$70,423
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$59,197
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,560
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$40,071
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$31,560
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$39,726
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$65,996
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$69,234
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$42,550
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
28.0%

Puerto Rican vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (26.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 200.2%), married-couple family poverty (12.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 192.5%), and family poverty (20.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 177.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 57.8%), single mother poverty (44.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 69.7%), and single female poverty (34.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 86.6%).
Puerto Rican vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricPuerto RicanBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
29.8%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
32.8%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
32.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
31.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
44.5%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
8.6%

Puerto Rican vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 93.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (9.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 82.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 79.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.2%).
Puerto Rican vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPuerto RicanBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
18.4%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
27.5%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
16.7%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Puerto Rican vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (58.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (30.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
Puerto Rican vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPuerto RicanBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
58.1%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.1%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.3%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.2%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.9%
Exceptional
83.6%

Puerto Rican vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (45.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 73.2%), single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 65.3%), and divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.9%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 11.4%).
Puerto Rican vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPuerto RicanBurmese
Family Households
Fair
64.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.6%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.28
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
45.7%
Exceptional
26.4%

Puerto Rican vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 60.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 32.2%).
Puerto Rican vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPuerto RicanBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.5%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.6%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
6.8%

Puerto Rican vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 89.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 88.3%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 76.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%).
Puerto Rican vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricPuerto RicanBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
86.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.1%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.8%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.2%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Puerto Rican vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 109.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (8.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 73.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 15.2%), cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.2%).
Puerto Rican vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricPuerto RicanBurmese
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.9%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.3%