Costa Rican vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Costa Rican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Costa Ricans

Burmese

Average
Exceptional
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Costa Rican Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,245,134 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 29.9 Burmese.
Costa Rican Integration in Burmese Communities

Costa Rican vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $65,236, a difference of 20.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $113,701, a difference of 19.0%), and median family income ($103,989 compared to $123,369, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $54,800, a difference of 3.2%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $44,911, a difference of 13.4%).
Costa Rican vs Burmese Income
Income MetricCosta RicanBurmese
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,090
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Good
$103,989
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,262
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Average
$46,645
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,279
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,622
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,106
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,565
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,779
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,638
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Tragic
28.0%

Costa Rican vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 34.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 27.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.57%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.2%).
Costa Rican vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricCosta RicanBurmese
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Average
9.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Average
29.0%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
8.6%

Costa Rican vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Costa Rican vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCosta RicanBurmese
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%

Costa Rican vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.70%).
Costa Rican vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCosta RicanBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
83.6%

Costa Rican vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 24.0%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.28%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%).
Costa Rican vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCosta RicanBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.7%
Exceptional
26.4%

Costa Rican vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.47%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.11%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.47%).
Costa Rican vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCosta RicanBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.9%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.8%

Costa Rican vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.6%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 37.4%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
Costa Rican vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricCosta RicanBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.4%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.7%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.6%

Costa Rican vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Costa Rican vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricCosta RicanBurmese
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.9%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%