Latvian vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,585,409 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.994% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 994.1 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($97,311 compared to $103,145, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $71,139, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $121,444, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.51%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $52,005, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $44,911, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.2%), poverty (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.1%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.3%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.060%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (71.6% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 0.40%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.8%).