Jamaican vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Jamaican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Jamaicans

Burmese

Tragic
Exceptional
821
SOCIAL INDEX
5.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
337th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Jamaican Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 338,047,346 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Jamaican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.646. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jamaicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jamaicans corresponds to a decrease of 26.9 Burmese.
Jamaican Integration in Burmese Communities

Jamaican vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 43.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,327 compared to $121,444, a difference of 37.5%), and median family income ($90,581 compared to $123,369, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,929 compared to $54,800, a difference of 7.6%), median female earnings ($38,670 compared to $44,911, a difference of 16.1%), and median earnings ($43,343 compared to $54,559, a difference of 25.9%).
Jamaican vs Burmese Income
Income MetricJamaicanBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,231
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,581
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,583
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,343
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,632
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,670
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,929
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,933
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,327
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,560
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
28.0%

Jamaican vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 89.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 54.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.1%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.7%).
Jamaican vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricJamaicanBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
8.6%

Jamaican vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.7%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.2%).
Jamaican vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricJamaicanBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Jamaican vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Jamaican vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricJamaicanBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.9%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.7%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Jamaican vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 55.9%), births to unmarried women (38.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 46.0%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.0%).
Jamaican vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricJamaicanBurmese
Family Households
Average
64.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.31
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
26.4%

Jamaican vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 85.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 47.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 10.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 26.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 35.8%).
Jamaican vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricJamaicanBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
82.1%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.8%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.6%
Exceptional
6.8%

Jamaican vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 81.0%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 64.9%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Jamaican vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricJamaicanBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.7%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.2%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.5%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.9%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Jamaican vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.0%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.5%).
Jamaican vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricJamaicanBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Poor
11.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.7%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%