Hmong vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,541,421 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.100. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.129% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 129.5 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $121,444, a difference of 37.8%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $52,005, a difference of 36.4%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $103,145, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $54,800, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $71,139, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 40.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 34.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 67.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and family households (64.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 67.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 64.0%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 42.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.3%).