Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scotch-Irish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scotch-Irish

Burmese

Average
Exceptional
5,433
SOCIAL INDEX
51.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
176th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Scotch-Irish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,048,604 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to a decrease of 8.2 Burmese.
Scotch-Irish Integration in Burmese Communities

Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($80,972 compared to $103,145, a difference of 27.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,969 compared to $113,701, a difference of 26.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,073 compared to $121,444, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $54,800, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $71,139, a difference of 19.7%).
Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Income
Income MetricScotch-IrishBurmese
Per Capita Income
Fair
$42,563
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,591
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,972
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Poor
$44,924
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,658
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,383
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,039
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,969
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,073
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,447
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Tragic
28.0%

Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 37.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 32.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.1%).
Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricScotch-IrishBurmese
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.5%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
8.6%

Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScotch-IrishBurmese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScotch-IrishBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.6%

Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.2%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.40%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScotch-IrishBurmese
Family Households
Average
64.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
26.4%

Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 42.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.7%).
Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScotch-IrishBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.9%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
6.8%

Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 42.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.5%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricScotch-IrishBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.8%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.9%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.3%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.4%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.6%

Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 52.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 40.7%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.3%).
Scotch-Irish vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricScotch-IrishBurmese
Disability
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.3%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%