Norwegian vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,451,795 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 21.9 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,084 compared to $103,145, a difference of 19.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $113,701, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $121,444, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $54,800, a difference of 3.2%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $44,911, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.90%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and poverty (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 33.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.3%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.56%), currently married (50.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (63.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 50.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.6%), no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 44.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 49.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.85%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%).