South African vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,834,295 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.167% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 166.6 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,719 compared to $121,444, a difference of 10.7%), median household income ($93,379 compared to $103,145, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,160 compared to $113,701, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), per capita income ($50,044 compared to $52,005, a difference of 3.9%), and median male earnings ($61,460 compared to $65,236, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 22.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 15.7%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (47.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (63.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.7%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and master's degree (18.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.4%).