Belizean vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Belizean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Belizeans

Burmese

Tragic
Exceptional
1,156
SOCIAL INDEX
9.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
320th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Belizean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,044,379 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.096% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to an increase of 96.5 Burmese.
Belizean Integration in Burmese Communities

Belizean vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,684 compared to $121,444, a difference of 36.9%), median family income ($90,880 compared to $123,369, a difference of 35.7%), and median male earnings ($48,358 compared to $65,236, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $54,800, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($37,429 compared to $44,911, a difference of 20.0%), and median earnings ($42,702 compared to $54,559, a difference of 27.8%).
Belizean vs Burmese Income
Income MetricBelizeanBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,097
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,880
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,028
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,702
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,358
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,429
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,094
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,534
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,684
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,580
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
28.0%

Belizean vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 71.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 55.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.5%).
Belizean vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricBelizeanBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.2%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
8.6%

Belizean vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.6%).
Belizean vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBelizeanBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.9%

Belizean vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Belizean vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBelizeanBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.8%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.4%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
83.6%

Belizean vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.9%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 40.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.39 compared to 3.22, a difference of 5.3%).
Belizean vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBelizeanBurmese
Family Households
Excellent
64.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.39
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.0%
Exceptional
26.4%

Belizean vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 48.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 5.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.2%).
Belizean vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBelizeanBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.3%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.7%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.0%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
6.8%

Belizean vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 89.1%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 72.2%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Belizean vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricBelizeanBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.4%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.6%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.8%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Belizean vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.8%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Belizean vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricBelizeanBurmese
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%