Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Lithuania

Burmese

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,761,129 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.599. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.316% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to a decrease of 315.7 Burmese.
Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Burmese Communities

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $71,139, a difference of 7.6%), median household income ($96,836 compared to $103,145, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $121,444, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $54,800, a difference of 0.42%), per capita income ($51,361 compared to $52,005, a difference of 1.3%), and wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaBurmese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,361
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,053
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,836
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,769
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,346
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,317
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,028
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,149
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,336
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,087
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Tragic
28.0%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.6%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.010%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.84%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaBurmese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.2%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
8.6%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaBurmese
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.55%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.8%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.21%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaBurmese
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
26.4%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.20%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
6.8%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.3%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.4%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.35%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaBurmese
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%