Osage vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,186,403 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.482. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.057% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 57.1 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $121,444, a difference of 37.4%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $103,145, a difference of 37.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $113,701, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $54,800, a difference of 19.7%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $44,911, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 48.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 46.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.1%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 25.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.9%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 66.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.9%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 62.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 57.3%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.6%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.4%).