Shoshone vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Shoshone
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Shoshone

Burmese

Fair
Exceptional
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Shoshone Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,589,977 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.555. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.064% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to a decrease of 64.3 Burmese.
Shoshone Integration in Burmese Communities

Shoshone vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $121,444, a difference of 45.3%), median household income ($72,660 compared to $103,145, a difference of 42.0%), and median family income ($87,872 compared to $123,369, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 10.1%), householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $54,800, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($34,677 compared to $44,911, a difference of 29.5%).
Shoshone vs Burmese Income
Income MetricShoshoneBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,072
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,872
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,660
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,932
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,930
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,677
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,720
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,062
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,588
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,681
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.4%
Tragic
28.0%

Shoshone vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 51.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 49.6%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.5%).
Shoshone vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricShoshoneBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
8.6%

Shoshone vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 103.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 62.4%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.0%).
Shoshone vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricShoshoneBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.7%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%

Shoshone vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Shoshone vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricShoshoneBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.8%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.3%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.3%
Exceptional
83.6%

Shoshone vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 33.9%), divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 31.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.0%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.22, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.4%).
Shoshone vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricShoshoneBurmese
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
26.4%

Shoshone vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.12%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.7%).
Shoshone vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricShoshoneBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.9%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
6.8%

Shoshone vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 90.5%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 85.7%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 77.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
Shoshone vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricShoshoneBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.4%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.3%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Shoshone vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 57.0%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.2%).
Shoshone vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricShoshoneBurmese
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.9%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%