Kiowa vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Kiowa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Kiowa

Burmese

Poor
Exceptional
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Kiowa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,591,937 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.084% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to a decrease of 83.7 Burmese.
Kiowa Integration in Burmese Communities

Kiowa vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $121,444, a difference of 62.3%), median household income ($65,914 compared to $103,145, a difference of 56.5%), and median family income ($80,885 compared to $123,369, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 18.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $54,800, a difference of 22.5%), and median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $44,911, a difference of 31.8%).
Kiowa vs Burmese Income
Income MetricKiowaBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,102
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$80,885
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$65,914
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,232
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,094
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,074
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,733
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,776
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$74,815
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,140
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
28.0%

Kiowa vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 84.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 82.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.9%), and single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 35.1%).
Kiowa vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricKiowaBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
8.6%

Kiowa vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 48.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Kiowa vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricKiowaBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Kiowa vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.0%).
Kiowa vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricKiowaBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.4%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
83.6%

Kiowa vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 63.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.2%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (61.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 7.1%).
Kiowa vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricKiowaBurmese
Family Households
Tragic
61.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
43.1%
Exceptional
26.4%

Kiowa vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 19.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 7.3%).
Kiowa vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricKiowaBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.5%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.5%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
6.8%

Kiowa vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 99.3%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 81.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Kiowa vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricKiowaBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.8%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.0%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Kiowa vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 88.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 75.8%), and ambulatory disability (8.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 31.5%).
Kiowa vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricKiowaBurmese
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.2%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%