Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from South America
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from South America

Burmese

Average
Exceptional
4,371
SOCIAL INDEX
41.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
200th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Immigrants from South America Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 431,481,928 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.529. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to a decrease of 19.5 Burmese.
Immigrants from South America Integration in Burmese Communities

Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($100,414 compared to $123,369, a difference of 22.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,126 compared to $121,444, a difference of 22.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,042 compared to $113,701, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,268 compared to $54,800, a difference of 0.98%), median female earnings ($39,643 compared to $44,911, a difference of 13.3%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 13.8%).
Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from South AmericaBurmese
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,068
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,414
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Average
$85,611
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Average
$46,548
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,962
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,643
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,268
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$94,042
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,126
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,151
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.6%
Tragic
28.0%

Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 48.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.9%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from South AmericaBurmese
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Poor
9.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
8.6%

Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from South AmericaBurmese
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from South AmericaBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.0%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.17%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from South AmericaBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Poor
45.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
32.0%
Exceptional
26.4%

Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.4%).
Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from South AmericaBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.8%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
6.8%

Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.6%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from South AmericaBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.4%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.7%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.6%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from South AmericaBurmese
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%