Sri Lankan vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sri Lankan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sri Lankans

Burmese

Good
Exceptional
7,460
SOCIAL INDEX
72.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
116th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Sri Lankan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 402,013,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Burmese.
Sri Lankan Integration in Burmese Communities

Sri Lankan vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,014 compared to $52,005, a difference of 18.2%), median male earnings ($56,136 compared to $65,236, a difference of 16.2%), and median family income ($108,234 compared to $123,369, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $54,800, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and median household income ($93,093 compared to $103,145, a difference of 10.8%).
Sri Lankan vs Burmese Income
Income MetricSri LankanBurmese
Per Capita Income
Average
$44,014
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,234
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,093
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,040
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,136
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,496
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,470
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,960
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,270
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,201
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
28.0%

Sri Lankan vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 22.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.7%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Sri Lankan vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricSri LankanBurmese
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.7%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
8.6%

Sri Lankan vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.3%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.64%).
Sri Lankan vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSri LankanBurmese
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

Sri Lankan vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Sri Lankan vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSri LankanBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.9%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.6%

Sri Lankan vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (67.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Sri Lankan vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSri LankanBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
67.7%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.9%
Exceptional
26.4%

Sri Lankan vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 27.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 14.1%).
Sri Lankan vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSri LankanBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.5%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.0%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
6.8%

Sri Lankan vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.4%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.1%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Sri Lankan vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricSri LankanBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.2%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.2%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.6%

Sri Lankan vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Sri Lankan vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricSri LankanBurmese
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.5%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%