Ghanaian vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,720,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.122% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 121.7 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $113,701, a difference of 26.1%), wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,277 compared to $121,444, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $54,800, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $44,911, a difference of 11.1%), and median earnings ($46,440 compared to $54,559, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 61.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 45.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.4%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 29.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 70.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 43.7%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 26.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.3%).