Croatian vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Croatian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Croatians

Burmese

Excellent
Exceptional
8,930
SOCIAL INDEX
86.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
37th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Croatian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 345,276,950 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Croatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Croatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Croatians corresponds to an increase of 56.4 Burmese.
Croatian Integration in Burmese Communities

Croatian vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Croatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,685 compared to $103,145, a difference of 13.7%), householder income over 65 years ($63,225 compared to $71,139, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,383 compared to $121,444, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,662 compared to $54,800, a difference of 6.1%), and per capita income ($47,742 compared to $52,005, a difference of 8.9%).
Croatian vs Burmese Income
Income MetricCroatianBurmese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,742
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,370
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,685
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,724
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,715
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,993
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,662
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,414
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,383
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,225
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
28.0%

Croatian vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Croatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 16.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Croatian vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricCroatianBurmese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
8.6%

Croatian vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Croatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.34%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Croatian vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCroatianBurmese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Croatian vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Croatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.41%).
Croatian vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCroatianBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.1%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.6%

Croatian vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Croatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.5%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.090%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (63.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Croatian vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCroatianBurmese
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Exceptional
26.4%

Croatian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Croatian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCroatianBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.8%

Croatian vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Croatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.2%), and professional degree (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
Croatian vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricCroatianBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.6%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.6%

Croatian vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 37.0%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.48%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.3%).
Croatian vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricCroatianBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Fair
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%