Laotian vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,240,588 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 18.9 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $52,005, a difference of 10.5%), median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $65,236, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $121,444, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $54,800, a difference of 0.79%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $44,911, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.2%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.2%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.8%).