Israeli vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Israeli
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Israelis

Burmese

Good
Exceptional
6,737
SOCIAL INDEX
64.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
145th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Israeli Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,453,844 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.360. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.221% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to a decrease of 220.8 Burmese.
Israeli Integration in Burmese Communities

Israeli vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($96,552 compared to $103,145, a difference of 6.8%), householder income over 65 years ($66,636 compared to $71,139, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,186 compared to $121,444, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,596 compared to $52,005, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and median female earnings ($43,852 compared to $44,911, a difference of 2.4%).
Israeli vs Burmese Income
Income MetricIsraeliBurmese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,596
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,577
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,552
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,937
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,228
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,852
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Average
$52,335
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,579
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,186
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,636
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.0%

Israeli vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 25.1%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 23.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 6.7%), single female poverty (19.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 8.9%).
Israeli vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricIsraeliBurmese
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Fair
11.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Average
13.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.6%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Average
12.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
8.6%

Israeli vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.6%).
Israeli vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIsraeliBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.0%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%

Israeli vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Israeli vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIsraeliBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.4%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.6%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.7%
Exceptional
83.6%

Israeli vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.4%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.34%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Israeli vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIsraeliBurmese
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
26.4%

Israeli vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.4%), no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 23.1%).
Israeli vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIsraeliBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.4%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.7%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.9%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
6.8%

Israeli vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.9%), master's degree (20.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%).
Israeli vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricIsraeliBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.3%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.4%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.3%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.7%
Exceptional
2.6%

Israeli vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.31%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Israeli vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricIsraeliBurmese
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.4%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%