Filipino vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Filipinos

Burmese

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Filipino Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,283,577 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.350% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 350.1 Burmese.
Filipino Integration in Burmese Communities

Filipino vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $65,236, a difference of 13.8%), per capita income ($59,066 compared to $52,005, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $113,701, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $54,800, a difference of 5.4%), wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $71,139, a difference of 7.8%).
Filipino vs Burmese Income
Income MetricFilipinoBurmese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$59,066
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$138,397
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$115,509
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$61,197
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$74,224
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,508
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,740
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,723
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$134,910
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$76,686
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.7%
Tragic
28.0%

Filipino vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.46%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Filipino vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricFilipinoBurmese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.3%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.6%

Filipino vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.58%).
Filipino vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFilipinoBurmese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Filipino vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.38%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
Filipino vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFilipinoBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.4%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Exceptional
83.6%

Filipino vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.7%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.19%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.48%).
Filipino vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFilipinoBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.0%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
26.4%

Filipino vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.81%).
Filipino vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFilipinoBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
6.8%

Filipino vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.3%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%).
Filipino vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricFilipinoBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.5%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
75.5%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
52.7%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
23.4%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Filipino vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.8%).
Filipino vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricFilipinoBurmese
Disability
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%