Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from South Central Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from South Central Asia

Burmese

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,877,715 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 7.8 Burmese.
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Burmese Communities

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $65,236, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $54,800, a difference of 5.5%), and wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,660 compared to $52,005, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $71,139, a difference of 1.5%), and median family income ($125,956 compared to $123,369, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaBurmese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,660
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,956
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$106,057
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$57,114
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$68,960
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,324
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,818
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$116,626
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$124,188
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$70,103
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.3%
Tragic
28.0%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.5%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father poverty (14.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.21%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaBurmese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.6%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.3%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
8.6%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaBurmese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.53%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.0%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.8%), family households with children (30.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.37%), family households (66.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (50.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.0%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.6%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
26.4%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.8%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
6.8%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.1%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.010%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Good
97.5%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
72.1%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.7%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.7%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.2%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and male disability (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaBurmese
Disability
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%