Panamanian vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Panamanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Panamanians

Burmese

Poor
Exceptional
2,119
SOCIAL INDEX
18.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
268th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Panamanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,971,776 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to an increase of 27.1 Burmese.
Panamanian Integration in Burmese Communities

Panamanian vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,066 compared to $121,444, a difference of 26.4%), median family income ($97,683 compared to $123,369, a difference of 26.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,193 compared to $113,701, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,611 compared to $54,800, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $44,911, a difference of 15.0%).
Panamanian vs Burmese Income
Income MetricPanamanianBurmese
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,035
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,683
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,272
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,593
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,835
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,049
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,611
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,193
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,066
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,266
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.4%
Tragic
28.0%

Panamanian vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 51.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 37.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.1%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.9%).
Panamanian vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricPanamanianBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
8.6%

Panamanian vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Panamanian vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPanamanianBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%

Panamanian vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Panamanian vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPanamanianBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.1%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
83.6%

Panamanian vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.7%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 29.7%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Panamanian vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPanamanianBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
26.4%

Panamanian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 29.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.1%).
Panamanian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPanamanianBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.5%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.5%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
6.8%

Panamanian vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.1%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 48.4%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Panamanian vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricPanamanianBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.8%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
58.3%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.1%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.5%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
2.6%

Panamanian vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.2%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.3%).
Panamanian vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricPanamanianBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%