Colville vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Colville
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBurmeseCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBelarusBelgiumBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Colville

Burmese

Poor
Exceptional
1,752
SOCIAL INDEX
15.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
289th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Colville Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,294,818 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Colville communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Colville within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.122% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Colville corresponds to an increase of 122.1 Burmese.
Colville Integration in Burmese Communities

Colville vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Colville and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,474 compared to $121,444, a difference of 47.2%), median household income ($70,094 compared to $103,145, a difference of 47.1%), and median family income ($85,792 compared to $123,369, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,774 compared to $54,800, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($37,514 compared to $44,911, a difference of 19.7%), and median earnings ($42,151 compared to $54,559, a difference of 29.4%).
Colville vs Burmese Income
Income MetricColvilleBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,047
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,792
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,094
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,151
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,516
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,514
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,774
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,604
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,474
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,739
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.3%
Tragic
28.0%

Colville vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Colville and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 111.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (25.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 94.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (24.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 85.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 30.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 34.0%), and single father poverty (21.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 38.1%).
Colville vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricColvilleBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.1%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
39.3%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
8.6%

Colville vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Colville and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 75.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (29.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 74.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.8%).
Colville vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricColvilleBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.8%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Colville vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Colville and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Colville vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricColvilleBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
59.8%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.5%
Exceptional
83.6%

Colville vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Colville and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (45.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 71.9%), single father households (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 62.1%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.5%), family households (63.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.6%).
Colville vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricColvilleBurmese
Family Households
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.0%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
45.3%
Exceptional
26.4%

Colville vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Colville and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 63.3%), no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 41.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 24.8%).
Colville vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricColvilleBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.7%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.8%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
25.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
6.8%

Colville vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Colville and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 69.2%), bachelor's degree (29.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 61.6%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 7th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
Colville vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricColvilleBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Colville vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Colville and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 192.5%), hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 91.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 72.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (55.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.9%).
Colville vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricColvilleBurmese
Disability
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.4%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%