Central American vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,184,281 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 9.1 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $65,236, a difference of 35.6%), median family income ($91,087 compared to $123,369, a difference of 35.4%), and per capita income ($38,560 compared to $52,005, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $54,800, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 21.2%), and median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $44,911, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 63.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 56.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.1%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.39%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.22, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.95%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 80.9%), no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 74.3%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 71.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 21.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.1%).