Sioux vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sioux

Burmese

Fair
Exceptional
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Sioux Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,681,481 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Burmese.
Sioux Integration in Burmese Communities

Sioux vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,921 compared to $52,005, a difference of 53.3%), median household income ($67,792 compared to $103,145, a difference of 52.1%), and median family income ($82,386 compared to $123,369, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 15.2%), householder income under 25 years ($46,417 compared to $54,800, a difference of 18.1%), and median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $44,911, a difference of 28.1%).
Sioux vs Burmese Income
Income MetricSiouxBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,921
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,386
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,792
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,448
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,566
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,063
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,417
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,089
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,750
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,509
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.3%
Tragic
28.0%

Sioux vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (15.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 116.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 105.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (26.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 103.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.5%), single mother poverty (38.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 47.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 51.1%).
Sioux vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricSiouxBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
8.6%

Sioux vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 94.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 88.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 76.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.5%).
Sioux vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSiouxBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Sioux vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 6.1%).
Sioux vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSiouxBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Sioux vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.6%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 60.5%), and births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.52 compared to 3.22, a difference of 9.3%).
Sioux vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSiouxBurmese
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.52
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.0%
Exceptional
26.4%

Sioux vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.24%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Sioux vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSiouxBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.8%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.8%

Sioux vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 87.6%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 84.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.54%).
Sioux vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricSiouxBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.4%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.0%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Sioux vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 62.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 50.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.6%).
Sioux vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricSiouxBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.7%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%