Native/Alaskan vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 435,476,711 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 2.4 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $52,005, a difference of 56.3%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $123,369, a difference of 52.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $121,444, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 14.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $54,800, a difference of 14.9%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $44,911, a difference of 32.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 99.7%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 94.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (25.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 93.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 32.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 34.4%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 39.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 77.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 68.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 63.0%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (66.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.22, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.66%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 107.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 99.1%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 98.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.11%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 73.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 66.2%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 15.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.2%).