Jordanian vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,143,722 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $113,701, a difference of 14.6%), per capita income ($45,605 compared to $52,005, a difference of 14.0%), and median household income ($91,794 compared to $103,145, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $54,800, a difference of 5.8%), and median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $44,911, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 18.1%), receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.31%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.83%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.5%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.71%).