Houma vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,006,103 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 15.6 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $121,444, a difference of 68.5%), median household income ($62,575 compared to $103,145, a difference of 64.8%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $123,369, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $54,800, a difference of 23.5%), median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $65,236, a difference of 29.1%), and wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 38.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 103.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 102.1%), and single male poverty (23.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 100.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 38.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 39.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 46.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 81.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 56.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 76.6%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 49.9%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 38.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 28.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 177.2%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 175.0%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 148.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.75%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 102.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 89.5%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 86.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.6%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 22.3%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.2%).