Cuban vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 400,992,278 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($84,981 compared to $123,369, a difference of 45.2%), householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $71,139, a difference of 44.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,301 compared to $121,444, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $54,800, a difference of 8.2%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $44,911, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 110.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.2%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 49.4%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%), family households (67.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.5%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 91.4%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 63.2%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.53%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.2%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.3%).