Fijian vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,677,491 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.052% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 51.9 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $65,236, a difference of 43.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $121,444, a difference of 42.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $113,701, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $54,800, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $71,139, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 50.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 50.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.88%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.7%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.24%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.22, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 133.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 109.9%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 91.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.53%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 43.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 30.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 6.8%).