Slovak vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slovak
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slovaks

Burmese

Good
Exceptional
6,550
SOCIAL INDEX
63.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
150th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Slovak Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 359,514,885 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to an increase of 14.9 Burmese.
Slovak Integration in Burmese Communities

Slovak vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,798 compared to $103,145, a difference of 23.1%), householder income over 65 years ($59,039 compared to $71,139, a difference of 20.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,029 compared to $121,444, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($49,753 compared to $54,800, a difference of 10.1%), and median female earnings ($39,029 compared to $44,911, a difference of 15.1%).
Slovak vs Burmese Income
Income MetricSlovakBurmese
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,229
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Good
$103,729
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,798
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Good
$47,095
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,306
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$39,029
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,753
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,032
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$101,029
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,039
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.9%
Tragic
28.0%

Slovak vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 33.3%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 25.4%), and single father poverty (19.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.0%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and poverty (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Slovak vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricSlovakBurmese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.6%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Fair
21.1%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
8.6%

Slovak vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Slovak vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlovakBurmese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Slovak vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.47%).
Slovak vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlovakBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.9%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.6%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.7%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.6%

Slovak vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.6%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and family households with children (25.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (47.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Slovak vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlovakBurmese
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.6%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.4%
Exceptional
26.4%

Slovak vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.32%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Slovak vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlovakBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
6.8%

Slovak vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 46.3%), no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 45.2%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
Slovak vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricSlovakBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.3%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.5%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Average
14.9%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.6%

Slovak vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 51.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.14%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.2%).
Slovak vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricSlovakBurmese
Disability
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.8%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%