Guatemalan vs Burmese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Burmese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guatemalans
Burmese
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Burmese Integration in Guatemalan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 369,211,669 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 12.2 Burmese.
Guatemalan vs Burmese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,295 compared to $123,369, a difference of 39.7%), median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $65,236, a difference of 39.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $121,444, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $54,800, a difference of 6.4%), wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 23.8%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $44,911, a difference of 25.8%).
Income Metric | Guatemalan | Burmese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,766 | Exceptional $52,005 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,295 | Exceptional $123,369 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,961 | Exceptional $103,145 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,205 | Exceptional $54,559 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,736 | Exceptional $65,236 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,695 | Exceptional $44,911 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,525 | Exceptional $54,800 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,331 | Exceptional $113,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,705 | Exceptional $121,444 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,526 | Exceptional $71,139 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 28.0% |
Guatemalan vs Burmese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 66.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 65.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.4%).
Poverty Metric | Guatemalan | Burmese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Guatemalan vs Burmese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Guatemalan | Burmese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Guatemalan vs Burmese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guatemalan | Burmese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Tragic 73.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Guatemalan vs Burmese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.8%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.81%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.22, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Guatemalan | Burmese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 49.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Guatemalan vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guatemalan | Burmese |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Guatemalan vs Burmese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 86.7%), no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 77.5%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Guatemalan | Burmese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Excellent 97.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.4% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Exceptional 88.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Exceptional 71.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 66.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Exceptional 54.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 46.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 19.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Guatemalan vs Burmese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.5%).
Disability Metric | Guatemalan | Burmese |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |