Tongan vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tongans

Burmese

Good
Exceptional
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Tongan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,328,291 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Tongan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tongans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tongans corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Burmese.
Tongan Integration in Burmese Communities

Tongan vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tongan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,693 compared to $52,005, a difference of 24.7%), median male earnings ($53,218 compared to $65,236, a difference of 22.6%), and median earnings ($45,665 compared to $54,559, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($56,972 compared to $54,800, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,235 compared to $71,139, a difference of 4.3%).
Tongan vs Burmese Income
Income MetricTonganBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,693
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,967
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,076
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,665
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,218
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,288
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$56,972
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,604
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,643
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,235
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Tragic
28.0%

Tongan vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tongan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (12.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 26.6%), single male poverty (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.35%), single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Tongan vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricTonganBurmese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.5%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%

Tongan vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tongan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%).
Tongan vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTonganBurmese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%

Tongan vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tongan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.59%).
Tongan vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTonganBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.9%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.1%
Exceptional
83.6%

Tongan vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tongan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and family households with children (31.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (51.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Tongan vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTonganBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
31.2%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.6%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
26.4%

Tongan vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 47.1%), no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 34.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 28.5%).
Tongan vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTonganBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.9%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
63.5%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
26.5%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
6.8%

Tongan vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tongan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 65.3%), master's degree (12.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 57.7%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
Tongan vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricTonganBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Poor
92.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.7%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.5%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.8%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.3%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.6%

Tongan vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.7%).
Tongan vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricTonganBurmese
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%