Portuguese vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,718,592 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,362 compared to $52,005, a difference of 17.2%), median family income ($106,286 compared to $123,369, a difference of 16.1%), and median household income ($88,976 compared to $103,145, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $54,800, a difference of 0.67%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $44,911, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 40.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 28.3%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.90%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 51.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 50.5%), and master's degree (13.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 43.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 14.0%).