Salvadoran vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Salvadoran
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Salvadorans

Burmese

Fair
Exceptional
2,588
SOCIAL INDEX
23.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
250th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Salvadoran Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,158,104 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Salvadoran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Salvadorans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Salvadorans corresponds to a decrease of 18.4 Burmese.
Salvadoran Integration in Burmese Communities

Salvadoran vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,646 compared to $65,236, a difference of 34.1%), per capita income ($38,858 compared to $52,005, a difference of 33.8%), and median family income ($94,109 compared to $123,369, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,412 compared to $54,800, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($59,141 compared to $71,139, a difference of 20.3%), and median female earnings ($37,083 compared to $44,911, a difference of 21.1%).
Salvadoran vs Burmese Income
Income MetricSalvadoranBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,858
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,109
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,449
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,912
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,646
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,083
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,412
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,198
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,842
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,141
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
28.0%

Salvadoran vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 52.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 51.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.97%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.8%).
Salvadoran vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricSalvadoranBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
8.6%

Salvadoran vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.4%).
Salvadoran vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSalvadoranBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

Salvadoran vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.97%).
Salvadoran vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSalvadoranBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Salvadoran vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.1%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (29.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.48 compared to 3.22, a difference of 8.1%).
Salvadoran vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSalvadoranBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
67.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.9%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.7%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.48
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
26.4%

Salvadoran vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Salvadoran vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSalvadoranBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.3%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
6.8%

Salvadoran vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 92.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 78.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Salvadoran vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricSalvadoranBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.4%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.3%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.6%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.3%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.8%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Salvadoran vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 21.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Salvadoran vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricSalvadoranBurmese
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.9%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%