Yaqui vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yaqui
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yaqui

Burmese

Poor
Exceptional
1,558
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
299th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Yaqui Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,519,512 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Yaqui communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yaqui within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yaqui corresponds to a decrease of 27.6 Burmese.
Yaqui Integration in Burmese Communities

Yaqui vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,112 compared to $52,005, a difference of 44.0%), median family income ($87,289 compared to $123,369, a difference of 41.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,914 compared to $121,444, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,300 compared to $54,800, a difference of 13.5%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,417 compared to $71,139, a difference of 26.1%).
Yaqui vs Burmese Income
Income MetricYaquiBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,112
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,289
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,596
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,647
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,777
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,943
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,300
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,656
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,914
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,417
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Tragic
28.0%

Yaqui vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 64.3%), receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 60.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.76%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 15.7%).
Yaqui vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricYaquiBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
24.9%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.1%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
8.6%

Yaqui vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.0%).
Yaqui vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYaquiBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%

Yaqui vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.7%).
Yaqui vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYaquiBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.5%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
83.6%

Yaqui vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.9%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 47.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.18%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.4%).
Yaqui vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYaquiBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.1%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
26.4%

Yaqui vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 29.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.0%).
Yaqui vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYaquiBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.5%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.6%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.9%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
6.8%

Yaqui vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 94.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 78.9%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.49%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Yaqui vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricYaquiBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.6%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Yaqui vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 46.1%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.1%).
Yaqui vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricYaquiBurmese
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%