Chickasaw vs Burmese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Burmese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Burmese
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Burmese Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,298,229 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 15.2 Burmese.
Chickasaw vs Burmese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $121,444, a difference of 47.8%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $103,145, a difference of 47.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $113,701, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,800, a difference of 22.4%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $44,911, a difference of 30.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $52,005 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $123,369 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $103,145 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $54,559 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $65,236 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $44,911 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,800 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $113,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $121,444 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $71,139 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.0% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 65.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 52.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.35%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 22.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 37.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.90%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 82.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Excellent 97.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 71.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 66.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 54.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 46.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 19.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Chickasaw vs Burmese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 74.9%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 71.9%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Burmese |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |