Immigrants from Europe vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,376,481 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,828 compared to $72,288, a difference of 11.5%), median household income ($95,032 compared to $100,151, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,984 compared to $117,750, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($52,195 compared to $52,297, a difference of 0.20%), median female earnings ($43,523 compared to $43,648, a difference of 0.29%), and median male earnings ($62,057 compared to $61,759, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and male poverty (10.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.6%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple households (47.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.1%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 43.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 36.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.1%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.47%).