Ecuadorian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 291,697,837 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.250. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 9.7 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $72,288, a difference of 31.5%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $119,800, a difference of 26.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $117,750, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $57,078, a difference of 5.9%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $43,648, a difference of 11.6%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $52,297, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 61.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 58.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.1%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.3%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.3%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 161.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 74.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 17.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 40.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 58.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 64.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 59.1%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 27.8%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.4%).