Ethiopian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,698,400 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 19.2 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 23.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,736 compared to $117,750, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $109,520, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $43,648, a difference of 0.94%), median earnings ($49,572 compared to $52,297, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $57,078, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.83%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.0%), married-couple households (43.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.8%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (42.8% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.19%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.62%).