Arapaho vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,013,453 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.320% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 320.0 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $117,750, a difference of 55.0%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $49,894, a difference of 54.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $109,520, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 15.0%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $72,288, a difference of 21.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $57,078, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 98.1%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 79.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 183.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 146.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 146.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 69.0%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.3%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.95%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.25, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 99.0%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 89.2%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 72.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 53.1%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.8%).